This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she's getting slammed for it

Meet Sarah, a young woman from a small town in America who recently won the lottery at just 20 years old. Her big win sparked excitement and curiosity among her community, but not everyone is celebrating her good fortune. The reason? Sarah chose to take $1,000 per week for life instead of the lump sum of $1 million cash.

At first glance, it might seem like a smart move - after all, who wouldn't want a guaranteed income stream that lasts a lifetime? But not everyone is convinced. Some people have taken to social media to express their disapproval, saying Sarah should be "ashamed" of herself for choosing the less lucrative option.

But what's really behind this backlash? Is it simply a case of jealousy, or are there other factors at play? We take a closer look at why some people might be slinging mud at Sarah's smart financial decision.

• Cash vs. steady income: For many, the idea of receiving a lump sum upfront is irresistible. But for others like Sarah, who value stability and predictability, taking a steady income stream can make more sense - especially if they're not yet ready to manage a large sum of money.
• Perception vs. reality: Some people might view Sarah's choice as "irresponsible" or "reckless," but the truth is, she may have simply chosen what makes the most sense for her individual circumstances.

Of course, we can't help but wonder - if you were in Sarah's shoes, which option would you choose? Share your thoughts with us in the comments!

(Want to stay on top of your finances like a pro? Check out our wireless guest paging system, perfect for keeping track of important reminders and tasks on-the-go.)